Probate Judge Danny Singleton Turns Probate Court into a Criminal Court, Putting Residents' Freedom at Risk

Singleton's tenure is marked by a series of heavy-handed rulings that undermine the fundamental principles of justice and fairness. As a result, public confidence in the court system is eroding, with many calling for a reevaluation of Singleton's approach and the urgent need for judicial reform.

Seneca, SC – For years, Judge Danny Singleton has been notorious for his harsh and often heartless approach to justice, both as a municipal judge and now as a probate court judge. Singleton, who should be providing solace and resolution in probate court, has instead turned it into a tribunal of fear, where attendees risk losing their freedom over minor or baseless infractions.

A Risk to Freedom in Probate Court

The probate court, traditionally a place where people deal with the aftermath of losing loved ones or seek to get married, has been transformed by Judge Singleton into a quasi-criminal court. Singleton's courtroom has become a perilous place, where even attending a hearing can result in contempt charges, baseless orders, and jail time. The mere appearance in his court can be a risk to one's freedom, as illustrated by several egregious cases.

The Case of Dr. Jason Boyle

One of the most shocking instances is the recent incarceration of Dr. Jason Boyle, PhD. Dr. Boyle was jailed on May 29, 2024, for exercising his First Amendment rights by recording in the court lobby and during interactions with the court clerk. Despite these actions being within his constitutional rights, Judge Singleton interpreted them as violations, leading to Dr. Boyle's imprisonment. This case highlights Singleton's misuse of power and disregard for constitutional freedoms, painting a grim picture of the judge's approach to justice.

The 89-Year-Old Minister's Ordeal

Another tragic case involves the 89-year-old Rev. Efford Haynes, who was sentenced to 10 days in jail by Judge Singleton. Haynes, who owned a building that the city wanted repaired or demolished, was found in contempt of court for failing to obtain the necessary permits—a task that was beyond his control. Despite his advanced age and health issues, Singleton showed no leniency. Haynes collapsed on the sidewalk after the ruling and was taken to the Oconee Medical Center before being booked into the county detention center.

Haynes' building, an empty structure once housing the anchor store of Harper's 5 & 10 chain, had become a contentious issue. Previously cited for contempt in December and January, with each citation resulting in a $500 fine, Haynes faced increasingly harsh penalties. Singleton's order gave Haynes until February 9 to obtain the permits, with fines accruing at $500 per day if the permits were not obtained. This relentless pressure exemplifies Singleton's punitive approach.

Targeting the Widow of Doyle Elton Pierce

Now, Judge Singleton has turned his focus to Dorothy Pierce, the widow of Doyle Elton Pierce. Pierce is at risk of being thrown in jail at any moment in retaliation for appealing Singleton's orders and correcting him in several emails where he clearly violated her rights. Singleton has used his position to coerce her into withdrawing her appeals and to unfairly shoulder the burden of estate taxes as an heir, despite there being four beneficiaries of the estate.

Pierce's situation highlights the judge's pattern of using his authority to intimidate and penalize those who challenge his rulings. By targeting Pierce, Singleton demonstrates a blatant disregard for justice and due process, further tarnishing the reputation of the probate court.

Singleton's Pattern of Harsh Sentences

Judge Singleton's harsh sentencing is not limited to these cases. In another instance, Seneca businessman Allen Yarid faced jail time twice for failing to comply with court orders related to permits for his condemned building. Yarid's case, handled with the same severity, underscores the judge's tendency to issue jail sentences for issues typically resolved through fines or negotiations.

Conclusion

The actions of Judge Danny Singleton, both in municipal court and now in probate court, have created an atmosphere of fear and injustice. His harsh and often unwarranted sentences, especially in cases involving minor infractions or situations beyond the defendants' control, have turned the probate court into a venue where no one feels safe. Singleton's tenure is marked by a series of heavy-handed rulings that undermine the fundamental principles of justice and fairness. As a result, public confidence in the court system is eroding, with many calling for a reevaluation of Singleton's approach and the urgent need for judicial reform.